I ABSOLUTELY can NOT say that UCLA was the best team at Irvine. UCLA has an amazing history, and they are still very, very strong. And I pretty much love their team to death as well, but they are no longer hands down the best team on the West Coast.
Reasons why UCLA is no longer the hands-down best program on the west coast:
1.) The West grew up. Look at how many programs are being born in the West Coast (Irvine, Scripps, UCSD, Washington, CMC - If I remember correctly they are fairly young too?). There is a much stiffer competition out there now then there used to be.
2.) I'm a results guy, I like to see results before I claim someone is the best. Who took the tournament out in Irvine? That's right, Cal.
3.) Which programs out in the west had to turn down two bids (i.e. All 4 teams from their programs qualified), I really don't care to list them. If I did, however, UCLA would not be on that list.
Conclusion:
With the likes of Cal, Irvine, Claremont McKenna, Stanford, ASU, USC, Redlands, UCSD, Washington, UCLA has some competition. Look back at that list and there are 5 youngish programs, 2 first year programs. I would already match Irvine up against UCLA as one of the best programs in the West. Cal is a given, they have proved all year long that they are a program to be reckoned with. I competed against Claremont McKenna and would not be afraid to put them up against UCLA A.
With all that being said, I LOVE UCLA. They are a tremendous team. But you TRULY underestimate the rest of the west if you think they are the hands-down best team of the West Coast. You would make the same mistake putting NYU over Columbia (so far both teams are 2-2 against each other when it counts).
As far as the other teams, Furman, still a great program, but there are going to be a lot of great programs in Greenville. I don't think Furman will finish 8-0 with a PD of +80. I do think they'll qualify.
Bellarmine is fantastic, I am being honest when I say that is the team that scares me the most in Memphis. But I think it would be far too presumptuous to claim that they are the best there. There are still lots of good teams.
How many of these teams that you are claiming to be the best in their ORCS have you seen btw? How many of the teams competing with them have you seen? I've seen damn near every team that was in Irvine this weekend, I've seen less of the others, but I've seen enough to stick by my statements.
EDIT: I am aware that Cal took the tournament based on CS and the 7-1 teams were Cal, and UCLA A and B. But if there are two 7-1 teams at the end of round 4 in the national tournament, the team given the go-ahead to compete in the final round is also determined by CS. My point is only to show there is more competition for the best team, then is being accredited by TCO.